After using a euphemism for the posterior defecation orifice to address a climate change denier with an explanation of the science, Zuckerberg's minions banned me for "bullying" the recipient.
The person in question had posted a statement about "fearfully waiting since 1978 for the world to cool as predicted" on a board where the impact of climate change was defined in terms of abnormal weather variations.
I'd post the comment here, but Zuckerberg's minions erased any history of it while condemning me to four days of separation from any interaction on its site. I appealed, indicating that calling a person a name isn't polite, but hardly reaches the level of "bullying."
I basically said that the "climate change" he researched for 10 minutes on Google doesn't take place in one afternoon, explaining in science in a two paragraph depth and then apologizing for stressing his 10-minute attention span by using big words and bigger concepts to address his statement.
In my appeal, besides questioning how using a derogatory term becomes "bullying," (I suspect that was the best the Snowflake could do to flag the comment as "inappropriate" to trigger Zuckerberg minions' effort to protect his ignorance) I cited the effect Zuckerberg's minions had on exchange of knowledge by banning the scientific explanation which addressed the original misinformation.
The response was the equivalent of "Noted" and on a further appeal added: "Our independent investigators will address this, IF they decide to look into it" -- essentially saying "kiss my posterior defecation orifice."
It's their site, and their choice of censorship, but the bots will have a difficult time reaching me here.
